Montana’s TikTok ban raises legal and technical questions

Montana Gov. Greg Gianforte on Wednesday signed into legislation a first-of-its variety invoice that makes it unlawful for TikTok to function within the state, organising a possible authorized struggle with the corporate amid a litany of questions over whether or not the state may even implement the legislation.

The brand new guidelines in Montana can have extra far-reaching results than TikTok bans already in place on government-issued units in practically half the states and the U.S. federal authorities. There are 200,000 TikTok customers in Montana in addition to 6,000 companies that use the video-sharing platform, in line with firm spokesperson Jamal Brown.

Right here’s what it’s good to know:


Proponents of the legislation in Montana declare the Chinese language authorities may harvest U.S. consumer knowledge from TikTok and use the platform to push pro-Beijing misinformation or messages to the general public.

That mirrors arguments made by a bipartisan group of lawmakers within the U.S. Senate, in addition to the heads of the FBI and the CIA, all of whom have mentioned TikTok may pose a nationwide safety risk as a result of its Beijing-based father or mother firm ByteDance operates beneath Chinese language legislation.

Critics have pointed to China’s 2017 nationwide intelligence legislation that compels corporations to cooperate with the nation’s governments for state intelligence work. One other Chinese language legislation, carried out in 2014, has related mandates.

TikTok says it has by no means been requested at hand over its knowledge, and it wouldn’t achieve this if requested.


The legislation will prohibit downloads of TikTok within the state and positive any “entity” — an app retailer or TikTok — $10,000 per day for every time somebody accesses TikTok, “is obtainable the flexibility” to entry it, or downloads it.

Meaning Apple and Google, which function app shops on Apple and Android units, can be accountable for any violations. Penalties wouldn’t apply to customers.

The statewide ban received’t take impact till January 2024. It will be void if the social media platform is bought to an organization that’s not primarily based in “any nation designated as a international adversary” by the federal authorities.

The governor indicated he desires to broaden the invoice to different social media apps to be able to handle among the invoice’s “technical and authorized considerations.” However the legislature adjourned earlier than sending him the invoice, which meant he couldn’t supply his amendments.

Montana Lawyer Basic Austin Knudsen has pointed to expertise used to limit on-line sports activities playing apps as a solution to curtail TikTok from working within the state. These violations will be reported by anybody. And as soon as the state verifies a breach has taken place, it sends a cease-and-desist letter to the corporate concerned, mentioned Kyler Nerison, a spokesperson for Knudsen’s workplace. He mentioned totally different corporations use totally different strategies for compliance and it’s as much as them “to not enable their apps to work in Montana and different states the place they aren’t authorized.”


Cybersecurity consultants say that, apart from avoiding the positive, there’s nothing incentivizing the businesses concerned to conform and will probably be extraordinarily tough — if not unimaginable — to adequately implement the legislation.

For one, the U.S. doesn’t have something equal to the kind of management nations like China have on what their residents entry on the internet. Compounding that, web service suppliers are out of the image.

Earlier than the Montana legislation handed, lawmakers rewrote parts of the invoice to allow them to off the hook after a lobbyist for AT&T mentioned throughout a February listening to the laws was “not workable” to put in force.


Apple and Google haven’t spoken out towards the legislation. However a consultant for TechNet, the commerce group that counts the 2 tech giants as its members, has mentioned app shops don’t have the flexibility to “geofence” apps in numerous states and it could be unimaginable to stop TikTok from being downloaded in Montana. The group has additionally mentioned the accountability needs to be on an app to find out the place it will possibly function, not an app retailer.

Telecoms analyst Roger Entner, of Recon Analytics, says he believes the app shops may have the potential to implement the legislation, however it could be cumbersome to implement and stuffed with loopholes. Apple and Google’s address-linked billing could possibly be bypassed with pay as you go playing cards and IP geolocation simply masked through the use of a VPN service, which might alter IP addresses and permits customers to evade content material restrictions, mentioned cell safety professional Will Strafach, the founding father of Guardian, which makes a privateness safety app for Apple units.

Oded Vanunu, head of merchandise vulnerability analysis on the cybersecurity agency Examine Level, agreed it could be tough for app shops to isolate a single state from downloading an app. He instructed it could be extra possible for TikTok to conform because it controls the software program and may “regulate the settings primarily based on the geographical location or IP addresses” of customers.


When customers enable TikTok to gather their location info, it will possibly monitor an individual to no less than 3 sq. kilometers (1.16 sq. miles) from their precise location. If that function is disabled, TikTok can nonetheless accumulate approximate location info – such because the area, metropolis or zip code through which a consumer could also be situated – primarily based on gadget or community info, like an IP handle.

However just like the app shops, cybersecurity consultants notice that any enforcement measures the corporate implements could possibly be simply bypassed with a VPN and efforts to make use of IP geolocating may result in different points.

David Choffnes, the chief director of the Cybersecurity and Privateness Institute at Northeastern College, mentioned cell suppliers could use the identical kinds of IP addresses for a number of states, which may imply somebody who isn’t in Montana may incorrectly be blocked from utilizing TikTok.


Seemingly a authorized battle.

Knudsen, Montana’s lawyer normal, has already mentioned he expects the legislation will find yourself in courtroom.

TikTok spokesperson Brooke Oberwetter mentioned in a ready assertion Wednesday that the legislation infringes on Montanan’s free speech rights and is illegal.

“We wish to reassure Montanans that they will proceed utilizing TikTok to specific themselves, earn a dwelling, and discover neighborhood as we proceed working to defend the rights of our customers inside and out of doors of Montana,” Oberwetter mentioned.

Oberwetter declined to say if the corporate will file a lawsuit however described among the authorized points at play. She argued Montana is making an attempt to override U.S. international coverage by claiming the invoice addresses a nationwide safety danger. She mentioned international coverage and nationwide safety legal guidelines should not made on the state stage.

NetChoice, a commerce group that represents TikTok and different tech corporations, says the invoice would violate the First Modification and “invoice of attainder” legal guidelines that prohibit the federal government from imposing a punishment on a selected entity with no formal trial.

Back To Top